Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 20 de 62
1.
Med Clin North Am ; 108(3): 419-425, 2024 May.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38548454

Chronic coronary heart disease encompasses a broad spectrum of disorders that range in severity from trivial to imminently life-threatening. The primary care physician encounters coronary disease at all stages. The number of available diagnostic and therapeutic options for evaluating and treating coronary disease is vast, presenting a complex selection strategy challenge when making choices for the individual patient. The primary care physician is responsible to tailor evaluation and management strategies to each individual patient based on his/her particular disease characteristics. There are many categories of diagnostic studies and therapeutic interventions that have been shown at the population level in clinical trials to improve patient outcomes. Blindly applying the findings of all demonstrated studies and therapies to a patient with coronary disease would saddle him/her with an unsustainable burden of diagnostic tests and therapies. The core principle of the approach outlined in this article is to tailor diagnostic and therapeutic choices to the operative pathophysiology that drives a particular patient's disorder. This introductory article is intended to provide a conceptual framework for studying and applying the specialized topics discussed in the articles that follow.


Atherosclerosis , Cardiovascular Diseases , Coronary Artery Disease , Myocardial Ischemia , Humans , Female , Male , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnosis , Coronary Artery Disease/therapy , Myocardial Ischemia/diagnosis , Atherosclerosis/diagnosis , Atherosclerosis/therapy , Chronic Disease
10.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 95(1): 118-127, 2020 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30980483

BACKGROUND: Minimizing radiation exposure during x-ray fluoroscopically guided procedures is critical to patients and to medical personnel. Tableside adjustment of x-ray image acquisition parameters can vary the fluoroscopic radiation exposure rate. OBJECTIVES: To determine the impact of adjusting four tableside controllable image acquisition parameters on x-ray fluoroscopic radiation exposure rate. METHODS: We made fluoroscopic exposures of a standard radiologic phantom to measure radiation exposure rates as kerma•area product per second of exposure and milligray per x-ray pulse under all possible combinations of detector zoom mode, collimated image field size, fluoroscopy dose mode, and fluoroscopy pulse frequency. RESULTS: Kerma•area product per second was linearly proportional to pulse frequency. Selecting larger detector zoom modes, smaller collimated image field sizes and low dose fluoroscopy mode each decreased exposure rate. We found a > 20-fold variation in dose rates over the range of acquisition parameter combinations. CONCLUSIONS: Selecting the most appropriate fluoroscopy acquisition parameters enables physician operators to adjust radiation exposure rates over a large range. Judicious selection of acquisition parameters can reduce patient and medical personnel radiation exposure by as much as 95% compared to "standard" fluoroscopy protocol settings.


Cardiovascular Diseases/therapy , Endovascular Procedures , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Exposure/prevention & control , Radiation Protection , Radiography, Interventional , Cardiovascular Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Fluoroscopy , Humans , Manikins , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Occupational Health , Patient Safety , Radiation Exposure/adverse effects , Radiography, Interventional/adverse effects , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Scattering, Radiation , Time Factors
13.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 92(2): 222-246, 2018 08 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30160001

The stimulus to create this document was the recognition that ionizing radiation-guided cardiovascular procedures are being performed with increasing frequency, leading to greater patient radiation exposure and, potentially, to greater exposure to clinical personnel. While the clinical benefit of these procedures is substantial, there is concern about the implications of medical radiation exposure. ACC leadership concluded that it is important to provide practitioners with an educational resource that assembles and interprets the current radiation knowledge base relevant to cardiovascular procedures. By applying this knowledge base, cardiovascular practitioners will be able to select procedures optimally, and minimize radiation exposure to patients and to clinical personnel. "Optimal Use of Ionizing Radiation in Cardiovascular Imaging - Best Practices for Safety and Effectiveness" is a comprehensive overview of ionizing radiation use in cardiovascular procedures and is published online. To provide the most value to our members, we divided the print version of this document into 2 focused parts. "Part I: Radiation Physics and Radiation Biology" addresses radiation physics, dosimetry and detrimental biologic effects. "Part II: Radiologic Equipment Operation, Dose-Sparing Methodologies, Patient and Medical Personnel Protection" covers the basics of operation and radiation delivery for the 3 cardiovascular imaging modalities (x-ray fluoroscopy, x-ray computed tomography, and nuclear scintigraphy). For each modality, it includes the determinants of radiation exposure and techniques to minimize exposure to both patients and to medical personnel.


Cardiac Imaging Techniques/standards , Cardiovascular Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Occupational Exposure/standards , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Exposure/standards , Benchmarking/standards , Consensus , Evidence-Based Medicine/standards , Humans , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Patient Safety/standards , Predictive Value of Tests , Radiation Exposure/adverse effects , Radiation Exposure/prevention & control , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors
14.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 92(2): 203-221, 2018 08 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30160013

The stimulus to create this document was the recognition that ionizing radiation-guided cardiovascular procedures are being performed with increasing frequency, leading to greater patient radiation exposure and, potentially, to greater exposure for clinical personnel. Although the clinical benefit of these procedures is substantial, there is concern about the implications of medical radiation exposure. The American College of Cardiology leadership concluded that it is important to provide practitioners with an educational resource that assembles and interprets the current radiation knowledge base relevant to cardiovascular procedures. By applying this knowledge base, cardiovascular practitioners will be able to select procedures optimally, and minimize radiation exposure to patients and to clinical personnel. Optimal Use of Ionizing Radiation in Cardiovascular Imaging: Best Practices for Safety and Effectiveness is a comprehensive overview of ionizing radiation use in cardiovascular procedures and is published online. To provide the most value to our members, we divided the print version of this document into 2 focused parts. Part I: Radiation Physics and Radiation Biology addresses the issue of medical radiation exposure, the basics of radiation physics and dosimetry, and the basics of radiation biology and radiation-induced adverse effects. Part II: Radiological Equipment Operation, Dose-Sparing Methodologies, Patient and Medical Personnel Protection covers the basics of operation and radiation delivery for the 3 cardiovascular imaging modalities (x-ray fluoroscopy, x-ray computed tomography, and nuclear scintigraphy) and will be published in the next issue of the Journal.


Cardiac Imaging Techniques/standards , Cardiovascular Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Exposure/standards , Benchmarking/standards , Consensus , Evidence-Based Medicine/standards , Humans , Patient Safety/standards , Predictive Value of Tests , Radiation Exposure/adverse effects , Radiation Exposure/prevention & control , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors
...